Blog Archive

You are viewing the monthly archive for: November, 2010

Does the Universe Have a Purpose? A Review of the Panel Debate with Craig and Dawkins

Andrew examines the opening arguments from the recent panel discussion in Mexico, where Bill Craig and Richard Dawkins finally go toe to toe (sort of). Upshot, the atheists get thrashed.

Read more »

“Bad things shouldn’t happen to good people”—why this argument fails against Christianity

A reply to ‘Upandatom’ on why the idea that bad things shouldn’t happen to good people actually supports God’s existence, rather than undermining it.

Read more »

What to do when skeptics attack libertarian free will—become a Calvinist

This is a continuation of the discussion started with Stuart in his article ‘Openness Theology (Part Two)’, exploring the ramifications of libertarian free will, the principle of alternative possibilities; and how an Arminian theology ultimately collapses into either a Reformed or Open theology, depending on how you push it.

Read more »

Matthew Flannagan to speak at EPS and SBL

Thinking Matters is proud to have one its close associates, Matthew Flannagan, speak at the Evangelical Philosophers Society and the Society of Biblical Literature Conferences in Atlanta, Georgia.

Read more »

Why there can’t be two gods

The first of a three-part series answering some questions about God, raised by an email correspondent named Albert.

Read more »

Apologetics is the Answer to Everything

Anthony Horvath, a pro-life advocate and Executive Director of Athanatos Christian Ministries, has written a provocative post about the importance of apologetics for the witness of the church today.

Read more »

Openness Theology (Part Two)

In this short essay I advance my own brief analysis as to why Generic Open Theism is philosophically flawed.

Read more »

Openness Theology (Part One)

Before any refutation of Openness Theology can take place, it is important to properly understand what it is and its distinctive features. Part one of this essay will distinguish what Alan R. Rhoda calls Generic Open Theism.

Read more »