Further Commentary on the Craig vs Harris Debate
There has been some good analysis of the recent debate between William Lane Craig and Sam Harris and I thought it might be useful to collect some of that commentary here into one post.
- Randy Everist has posted a review at Possible Worlds.
- Matt Flannagan has began a series of posts on the debate at MandM.
- Glenn Peoples offers his own analysis at Say Hello To My Little Friend.
- Luke Muehlhauser at Common Sense Atheism is also reviewing the debate in several parts: Part 1, Part 2.
- Wintery Knight has posted a lighter take on the event.
- In this week’s Q & A at Reasonable Faith, William Lane Craig further clarifies his “knock-down” argument against Harris’ position.
And, of course, you can find Bnonn’s thoughts on the clash here.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
[…] On April 7 at Notre Dame University, William Lane Craig and Sam Harris debated whether morality requires God. Dr. Glenn Peoples posted a detailed play-by-play of the debate on his blog, including links to the audio. There are several other reviews listed here. […]
[…] Below, I review the debate. Other reviews of the debate include: Russell Blackford, Wintery Knight, John Loftus, Randy Everist, J.W. Wartick, and more. […]
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!